Explain WHY and HOW Behind the WHAT

To Finish Meetings Faster Requires Explaining the White Space

To effectively control your meetings to finish meetings faster (ahead of schedule) requires effort that begins long before your meeting starts. We call the preparation period 7:59 work, as in before 8:00AM. After the meeting starts, you can further accelerate group performance by serving your group as an effective process police person.  While the role…

Details
Building Consensus - Modern Facilitative Leadership

Thoughts, Words, and Deeds – Foundation for Building Consensus

Even a lousy facilitator will succeed at building consensus when they draw line of sight from the meeting deliverable to the quality of life of the meeting participants. When meeting output directly impacts participants, they help the facilitator be more effective. CLEAR THINKING (thoughts) Highly effective facilitators know what ‘done’ looks like. Before the meeting…

Details
How to Facilitate Olympic Scoring

How to Facilitate Olympic Scoring – Innovative Ideas & Concepts

Purpose of Olympic Scoring is to . . . . . . extract some consensually validated new product, process, or other innovative ideas or concepts while encouraging 100 percent participation.The following is particularly appropriate when facilitating olympic scoring with larger groups of nine or more participants. Background of Olympic Scoring In advance, inform all of your participants…

Details
20 Popular Brain Breaks

Twenty Popular Brain Breaks to Stimulate Your Meeting Participants

Our MG RUSH Facilitative Leadership and Facilitator Training alumni have digital rights access to thousands of Brain Breaks (or, Brakes as a double entendre). Here are twenty very common examples for the rest of you. If you need help with the answers, simply reply with a comment or buy us a cup of coffee.  …

Details
Stormy Skies Scenario

How to Manage “Probabilities” in the Role of Facilitator: Create Ranges

Probabilities consist of commonly held assumptions, beliefs, and outlooks about some future state or condition. Forward looking deliverables such as five-year plans and shaping curves rely exclusively on the concept of probabilities, since no future state is certain. How can a facilitator help resolve arguments around conflicting probabilities, particularly when evidence supports multiple outcomes? Create…

Details
Support for Arguments

How to Make Thinking Visible — Three Forms of Business Argumentation Support

One prevailing reason for how to categorize input relies on common purpose. Most enterprises organize around common purpose. For example, treasury operations organize around the purpose of financial capital; human resources organize around the purpose of human capital; and marketing organizes around the purpose of products and services. Force your participants to make thinking visible.…

Details
Increase Friendliness by Avoiding Podiums

Increase Your Leadership Likeability By Strolling and Smiling More

Some of the best methodologists are also capable of facilitating complex topics requiring pre-thought and structure. Sometimes they fall flat on the personality factor, coming off as dispassionate, aloof, or insensitive. Most facilitators default in the other direction, they are typically warm and likable and good presenters but are frail when it comes to workshop…

Details
Continuous Improvement Pays for Itself

Methodological Awareness About Deming’s 14 Points of Continuous Improvement

Every minute somewhere, someone refers to Deming’s term SMART (ie, Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-Based). Lesser known however frequently copied you will find his philosophy of continuous improvement. Therefore, true to his words, enjoy the phrasing of Deming’s 14 points of continuous improvement. For quick, late-summer reading we are reminding you with our modified summary…

Details
Argumentation Relies on Facts, Presumptions, Assumptions, and Probabilities

Understand the Value of Argumentation for Organizational Decision-making

A strong facilitator will improve their critical thinking. They ought understand the holarchial nature of business and other people organized around common cause. Critical thinking helps structure discussions so that groups of people can get more done, faster. Therefore, understand and appreciate the value of argumentation. In 1962, when Thomas Watson (CEO of IBM) was…

Details
Getting to Know One Another, Icebreakers for Large Groups

Two Quick and Effective Icebreakers for Large Groups

All groups, especially very large groups, perform better when the participants know something about each other. Even though time constraints prohibit traditional, self-spoken icebreakers for large groups (eg, 60 people for two minutes each burns two hours), some time for social bonding remains effective. Consider the following simple, easy, icebreakers for large groups, even hundreds of people,…

Details