Ground Rules and Ideation Rules for Optimal Group Behavior in Meetings

Ground Rules and Ideation Rules for Optimal Group Behavior in Meetings

Use ground rules to help manage individual and group behavior during meetings and workshops.

You can lead meetings and discussions without ground rules, but did you ever leave an unstructured meeting with a headache? The term “discussion” is rooted similarly to the terms “concussion” and “percussion.” A little bit of structure will ensure that you get more done, fast.

Primary Ground Rules

Consider a few, select ground rules for every meeting, regardless of your situation. We consider the following four ground rules so important we use them in every meeting or workshop. The fifth meeting ground rule shown below (“No Hiding”) has been added for online meetings.

Ground Rules and Ideation Rules for Optimal Group Behavior in Meetings

Ground Rules poster available at the MGRUSH Facilitation Store

1. Be Here Now

First and foremost, speaks to the removal of distractions and getting participants to focus. “Be Here Now” demands that electronic leashes be reined in—i.e., phones on stun mode, laptops down, be punctual after breaks, and pay attention. The hardest thing to do with a group of smart people is to get them to focus on the same issue at the same time.

Your job is to remove distractions so that they can focus.

2. Consensus means “I can live with it”

We are NOT defining consensus as everyone’s favorite or top choice. Nor are we suggesting that our decisions will make everyone ‘happy.’ We are facilitating to a standard that everyone can professionally support. Participants agree they will NOT try to undermine the results after the meeting ends. If so, they are guilty of displaying a lack of integrity. We strive to build an agreement that is robust enough to be considered valid by everyone. No one should lose any sleep over the results. Remember, however, it may not be their ‘favorite’ course of action.

3. Silence or absence implies consensus

This ground rule applies to structured, for-profit situations and NOT necessarily unstructured, political, or social meetings. During our standard business meetings, participants have a duty to speak up. It remains the primary responsibility of the facilitator to protect all the meeting participants. It is NOT their job to reach down someone’s throat and pull it out of them. If participants have information to bear in a discussion, then it is their responsibility to share it. Participant involvement is their obligation, not simply their opportunity. Their silence speeds us up since we don’t have time to secure an audible from every participant on every point discussed in a meeting. Their silence indicates two positions that need to be stressed by the facilitator, namely:

  • They will support it, and
  • They will not lose any sleep over it.

If either is not true, shame on them—they are being paid to participate. If they cannot accept their fiduciary responsibility, they should work somewhere integrity is not valued.

4. Make your thinking visible

People do not think causally. They think symptomatically. Two people eating from the same bowl of chili may argue over how “spicy” it is. Note, that they seldom argue about verbs and nouns. Rather they argue about modifiers (e.g., adjectives and adverbs). They subjectively argue about spiciness. To one, the chili is hot. To the other, it is not. They are both right. A great facilitator will get them to ‘objectify’ their discussion so that they both can agree that the chili is 1,400 Scoville Units. They don’t think Scoville Units however, they think ‘hot”. As facilitator you must challenge them to make their thinking visible.

5. No hiding

For video conferences, enforce a rule that prohibits people from turning off their live video stream. When hidden, no one has any idea what they are doing or if they are even listening. Dr. Tufte uses the term “flatland” to describe the two-dimensional view, such as the view of online participants on a screen. Working in flatland makes it difficult enough to observe nonverbal reactions. Culturally, you may need to get participants’ permission to use this rule but don’t back down. Enforce “no hiding.”

Be Here Now — Our Most Popular Meeting Ground Rule

Constantly Reinforce Be Here Now

Simply applying the ground rule Be Here Now won’t alone solve the problem, but it will help, especially if you take the time to explain everything it means to your participants.

Arrow—

  • Post a visual agenda and put an arrow or other device on it to indicate where the group is on the agenda. Do not use the check box approach since it is never clear if the group is on the last checked box or the next unchecked box. Shopping mall signs indicate where you are, not where you were.

Consciousness—

  • Ask participants to “be here now’ and strive to keep their consciousness focused on listening and contributing. Ask them to stay fresh, and if necessary, take more frequent breaks. Bio-breaks should be offered more frequently in the morning and with virtual meetings (e.g., video presence). Consider 30-second “stretch” breaks every thirty minutes; offering up quick deep knee bends or shoulder turns to keep participants awake and fresh. Some cultures refer to this as a 30-30, and if it is part of your culture, use a timepiece or timer to signal each 30-minute segment.

Leashes—

  • Have participants disengage their electronic leashes and beware because the vibration mode does not mean silent, only lower tones. If participants cannot wait to address an electronic request, have them take it out of the room, but do not allow laptops, smartphones, and multitasking. Groups that claim to multi-task, perform mentally at the level of chimpanzees. Do you really want to facilitate a roomful of monkeys?

Punctuality—

  • Participants should not arrive late, either at the meeting start or after breaks. Start meetings on time so that you don’t punish the people who attend on time. Use MGRUSH timers to ensure on-time attendance after breaks.

Updates—

  • If participants are late or leave the room and then return, do not stop the meeting to give them a personal update. Personal updates penalize the on-time participants. Rather, refresh the tardy participants during the next break or pair them off with somebody and send them to the hallway for a one-on-one update, if the update cannot wait until the next break.

Consistently Demonstrate Be Here Now

To Be Here Now is infectious so lead the way. Arrive early and first. Watch your time closely and call breaks as needed. More is better so that participants can attend to their electronic updates. Most all agree that four 5-minute breaks during a morning session are better than one 20-minute break. Monitor them tightly however and do not allow leakage. Your group depends on you for their success.

Additional Meeting Ground Rules

We refer to other ground rules as ‘situational’. You will vary their use depending on meeting type, participants, deliverables, and timing. Some secondary meeting ground rules we have found particularly effective are shown below. We don’t have space to discuss them all, but our favorites, based on frequency of use, are italicized:

  • Be curious about different perspectives
  • Bring a problem, bring a solution
  • Challenge (or, test) assumptions
  • Chime in or chill out
  • Discuss undiscussable issues
  • Don’t beat a dead horse
  • Everyone has wisdom
  • Everyone will hear others 
and be heard
  • Focus on “WHAT” not “HOW”
  • Focus on interests, not positions
  • Hard on facts, soft on people
  • It’s not WHO is right; It’s WHAT is right
  • No “Yeah, but”—Make it “Yeah, AND…”
  • No big egos or war stories
  • Nobody is smarter than everybody
  • No praying underneath the table (i.e., texting)
  • One conversation at a time (Share airtime)
  • Players win games, teams win championships
  • Put on Your Sweaters (leave your egos and titles in the hallway)
  • Share reasons behind questions and answers
  • (or,) Share all relevant information
  • Speak for easy listening—headline first, background later
  • The team is responsible for the outcome
  • The whole is greater 
than the sum of the parts
  • Topless meetings (i.e., phones on stun, no laptops)
  • We need everyone’s wisdom

Brainstorming Ideation Rules

Here is an entirely different set of ideation rules that should be used during the Ideation step of the Brainstorming tool. While covered in detail in another article, we are providing the list below for your convenience. With these ideation rules or any of the above ground rules, do not hesitate to contact us for additional explanations:

  • 5-Minute Limit Rule (i.e., ELMO doll — Enough, Let’s Move On)
  • Accept the views of others
  • All ideas allowed
  • Be creative — experiment
  • Build on the ideas of others
  • Everyone participates
  • Fast pacing, high-energy
  • No discussion
  • No word-smithing
  • Passion is good
  • Stay focused on the topic
  • Suspend judgment, evaluation, and criticism
  • The step (or workshop) is informal
  • When in doubt, leave it in
ground rules, ideation rules

Ideation Ground Rules poster available at the MGRUSH Facilitation Store

______

Don’t ruin your career by hosting bad meetings. Sign up for a workshop or send this to someone who should. MGRUSH workshops focus on meeting design and practice. Each person practices tools, methods, and activities daily during the week. Therefore, while some call this immersion, we call it the road to building high-value facilitation skills.

Our workshops also provide a superb way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 CDUs from IIBA, 40 Continuous Learning Points (CLPs) based on Federal Acquisition Certification Continuous Professional Learning Requirements using Training and Education activities, 40 Professional Development Units (PDUs) from SAVE International, as well as 4.0 CEUs for other professions. (See workshop and Reference Manual descriptions for details.)

Want a free 10-minute break timer? Sign up for our once-monthly newsletter HERE and receive a free timer along with four other of our favorite facilitation tools.

Addicted to Being Right: 4 Participant Responses to Avoid Being Wrong

Addicted to Being Right: 4 Participant Responses to Avoid Being Wrong

Most people associate shame or loss of power with being wrong. Ever felt yourself getting defensive? When your meeting participants turn defensive, especially when they feel they are losing ground, neurochemistry hijacks the brain. Because they are addicted to being right, the amygdala, our instinctive brain, takes over.  With a focus on being right, participants are unable to regulate emotions or handle the gaps between expectations and reality.

“In situations of high stress, fear, or distrust the hormone and neurotransmitter cortisol flood the brain.  Executive functions that help us with advanced thought processes like strategy, trust building, and compassion shut down.”[1]

Scientific studies suggest four responses that every facilitator should expect from meeting participants, namely:

  1. Fight (keep arguing the point),
  2. Flight (revert to, and hide behind, group consensus),
  3. Freeze (disengage from the argument by shutting up)
  4. Appease (make nice to your adversary by simply agreeing with him)

Addicted to Being Right: Restoring Balance

Addicted to Being Right: 4 Participant Responses to Avoid Being Wrong

Addicted To Being Right Requires a Facilitator to Restore Balance

Without facilitation (especially active listening and challenge), the four responses lead to sub-optimal results because they prevent the honest and productive sharing of information and evidence-based proof.

Some suggest that “Fighting” is the most common and most damaging. Can you imagine a professional fight without a referee?  Of course not, and the facilitator is the meeting referee.  In humans, bio-chemicals drive the urge for “fighting”.

“When you argue and win, your brain floods with different hormones: adrenaline and dopamine, which makes you feel good, dominant, even invincible. It’s the feeling any of us would want to replicate. So the next time we’re in a tense situation, we fight again. We get addicted to being right.”

When these dominating personalities are allowed to take over a meeting, they become unaware of the impact on the people around them. While they are getting high from their dominance, others are being drummed into submission. Group dynamics undergo a strong diminishing of collaboration.

However, oxytocin can make people feel as good as adrenaline. Oxytocin activates connections and opens up the networks in our brains, driving from the prefrontal cortex. When participants feel connected, they open up to sharing and trust.

Addicted to Being Right: Facilitator Tips

Great facilitators seek to amplify the production of oxytocin while striving to avoid spikes of cortisol and adrenaline. Help others who display addiction to being right by embracing some or all of the following suggestions:

  • Anticipate and provide appropriate ground rules: Remind everyone that they have a fiduciary responsibility to speak up to support or defend claims
  • Avoid judging: focus on issues, not personalities
  • Carefully manage scope creep: strongly avoid the tendency for the group to fall into a harmful conversational pattern
  • Counteract the domineering: ensure that everyone contributes and consider going around in a circle (ie, ‘round-robin’) or demanding Post-It® notes from everyone with their point of view (again make sure you capture the perspectives visually and transfer small Post-It notes to large format display so that everyone can see all the claims)
  • Focus on open-ended questions: Be careful to avoid close-ended questions and force a multitude of open-ended responses
  • Listen with empathy: Strive to explore and understand everyone’s perspective as there can be more than one right answer
  • Provide visual feedback: Highlight the evidence-based claims (i.e., objective support)

“Connecting and bonding with others trumps conflict. I’ve found that even the best fighters — the proverbial smartest guys in the room — can break their addiction to being right by getting hooked on oxytocin-inducing behavior instead.”

[1] See “Conversational Intelligence: How Great Leaders Build Trust and Get Extraordinary Results” by Judith E. Glaser

______

Don’t ruin your career by hosting bad meetings. Sign up for a workshop or send this to someone who should. MGRUSH workshops focus on meeting design and practice. Each person practices tools, methods, and activities daily during the week. Therefore, while some call this immersion, we call it the road to building high-value facilitation skills.

Our workshops also provide a superb way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 CDUs from IIBA, 40 Continuous Learning Points (CLPs) based on Federal Acquisition Certification Continuous Professional Learning Requirements using Training and Education activities, 40 Professional Development Units (PDUs) from SAVE International, as well as 4.0 CEUs for other professions. (See workshop and Reference Manual descriptions for details.)

Want a free 10-minute break timer? Sign up for our once-monthly newsletter HERE and receive a free timer along with four other of our favorite facilitation tools.

Facilitating an Effective After-Action Review (AAR / Hot Wash): Agenda and Best Practices

Facilitating an Effective After-Action Review (AAR / Hot Wash): Agenda and Best Practices

An After-Action Review (AAR) is an effective tool for debriefing projects, programs, or other initiatives. It may also be considered similar to a Hot Wash, After-Action Debriefing, Look Back, Postmortem, or, in the Agile community, a Retrospective. Regardless of the name, the primary purpose of an AAR is for participants to reflect on what transpired, extract key lessons, and identify opportunities to enhance future performance.

Purpose of an After-Action Review Session

An After-Action Review is NOT intended to critique, grade success, or failure. Rather, it identifies weaknesses that need improvement and strengths that might be sustained.

An After-Action Review answers four “learning culture” questions:

  1. (Purpose) What was supposed to happen?
  2. (Results) What did happen?
  3. (Causes) What caused the difference?
  4. (Implications) What can we learn from this?

The After-Action Review provides a candid discussion of actual performance results compared to objectives. Hence, the engagement participants contribute their input and perspective. They provide their insight, observation, and questions that help reinforce strengths and identify and correct the deficiencies of the completed project or action.

Learning cultures highly value collaborative inquiry and reflection. Therefore, the U.S. Armed Forces use After-Action Reviews extensively, relying on a variety of means to collect hard, verifiable data to assess performance. The U.S. Army refers to the evidence as “ground truths.”

Participants identify mistakes they made as well as mistakes made by others. They prohibit any other use of candid discussions, including performance reviews.

Focus on WHAT can be learned, not WHO can be blamed.

The U.S. Army’s approach may use five basic guidelines that govern its After-Action Reviews, namely:

Guidelines for an After-Action Review Event, Meeting, or Workshop 

  1. Call it as you see it
  2. Discover the “ground truth”
  3. No sugar coating
  4. No thin or thick skins
  5. Take thorough notes
Fuzzy - Focus on What is Right, NOT Who is Right

After Action Review Focuses on Listening

After-action reviews emphasize openness, candor, and transparency. While complete candor can be difficult for many groups, it’s essential to encourage full disclosure during the process. Participants should identify their own mistakes and share constructive observations about others. It is crucial to make clear that the discussions are confidential and should not be used for purposes like performance evaluations.

An After-Action Review workshop can range from part of a day to a full week, depending on the scope of the initiative. It may involve twenty to thirty participants or more, though not everyone needs to be present simultaneously, allowing for flexible participation throughout the workshop.

Agenda for an After-Action Review Event, Meeting, or Workshop

 

  • Introduction

Begin with the MGRUSH introduction and emphasize the project objectives and expected impact of the project on the organizational holarchy. Carefully articulate and codify key assumptions or constraints.

 

  • Success Objectives

Results are compared to the SMART objectives. Items that worked or hampered provide input for later discussion. Be immediately cautious about scope creep. Questions that may be out-of-bounds at this time include why certain actions were taken, how stakeholders reacted, why adjustments were made (or not), what assumptions developed, and other questions that need to be managed later.

 

  • Goals and Considerations

Compare the project results to the fuzzy goals and other considerations. Be cautious to avoid scope creep. Manage other questions later such as why certain actions were taken, how stakeholders reacted, why adjustments occurred (or not), and what assumptions developed.

 

  • What Worked & Hampered

Results-focused discussion (or lack thereof) stimulates talk about options and conditions to leverage in future projects.

        • How stakeholders reacted
        • What assumptions developed
        • What worked and hampered
        • Why certain actions took priority
        • What adjustments worked (or not)
        • Other questions as appropriate.
  • Issues and Risks

Assess or build a risk management plan and other next steps or actions (e.g., Guardian of Change) based on actual results.

 

Use the four activities in the MGRUSH review and wrap-up

 

Special Ground Rules for an After-Action Review Event, Meeting, or Workshop

An AAR workshop can handle more than twenty people, with frequent use of break-out groups. Do not hesitate to partition the workshop so that participants may come and go as required. You may need to loop back, cover material built earlier, and clarify or add to it. Above all, the approach shifts the culture from one where blame is ascribed to one where learning is prized, yet team members willingly remain accountable.

Conduct After-Action Reviews consistently after all significant projects, programs, and initiatives. Therefore, do NOT isolate “failed” or “stressed” projects only. Additionally, ground rules and guidelines that have proven successful in the past include:

  • Do NOT judge the success or failure of individuals (i.e.; judge performance, not the person)
  • Encourage participants to raise any potentially important issues and lessons
  • Focus on the objectives first

 

For learning organizations

For learning organizations, the following also supports cultural growth:

  • Some of the most valuable learning derives from the most stressful situations
  • Transform subjective comments and observations into objective learning by converting adjectives such as “quick” into SMART criteria (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Adjustable, Relevant, and Time-Based) such as “less than 30 seconds.”
  • Use facilitators who understand the importance of neutrality and do not lecture or preach
  • Teach the team to teach itself

Therefore, effective use of After-Action Reviews supports a mindset in organizations that are never satisfied with the status quo—where candid, honest, and open discussion evidences learning as part of the organizational culture. In conclusion, learning is everyone’s responsibility and it begins with hard data used to analyze actual results.

_____

Don’t ruin your career by hosting bad meetings. Sign up for a workshop or send this to someone who should. MGRUSH workshops focus on meeting design and practice. Each person practices tools and methods daily during the week. While some call this immersion, we call it the road that yields high-value facilitation skills.

Our workshops also provide a superb way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 CDUs from IIBA, 40 Continuous Learning Points (CLPs) based on Federal Acquisition Certification Continuous Professional Learning Requirements using Training and Education activities, 40 Professional Development Units (PDUs) from SAVE International, as well as 4.0 CEUs for other professions. (See workshop and Reference Manual descriptions for details.)

Want a free 10-minute break timer? Sign up for our once-monthly newsletter HERE and receive a free timer along with four other of our favorite facilitation tools.

Go to the Facilitation Training Store to access proven, in-house resources, including full agendas, break timers, forms, and templates. Also, take a moment to SHARE this article with others.

To Help You Unlock Your Facilitation Potential: Experience Results-Driven Training for Maximum Impact    #facilitationtraining #meeting design

______

With Bookmarks no longer a feature in WordPress, we need to append the following for your benefit and reference

Becoming an Unconsciously Competent Facilitator

To become an unconsciously competent facilitator, you first become conscious and then competent. As you progress and increase your abilities, you will note an evolution of competency, illustrated in the chart below. First, note that consciousness precedes competence. You do not achieve a consistent level of success until you have developed consciousness about what is required. Secondly, you will discover that the amount of time between each of the stages decreases as you make progress. Let’s look at each of the stages and the aphorisms offered up by John Maxwell that capture the sentiment of each stage.

Becoming an Unconsciously Competent Facilitator

The Four Stages of Consciousness, Becoming an Unconsciously Competent Facilitator

Unconsciously Incompetent

Before you undertake a complex activity, you slumber through an area of unconscious incompetence. You may linger at this stage for decades. Look at the amount of time it takes to discover the difference between well-run and poorly-run meetings. In this stupor, you “do not know what you do not know.” You lack both knowledge and skills and are unaware of your incapacity.

Consciously Incompetent

Yet another stage remains before you become competent. Here you develop increased consciousness. During this stage, you also develop aspirations and hopes. You begin to envision yourself as competent and contributory. You may linger in this state for a long time, depending on your determination to learn and the real extent to which you accept your incompetence. Most importantly, your consciousness enables you to observe and identify the characteristics of competency, typically in others, as you begin to “know what you don’t know.”

Consciously Competent

Cast into the role of facilitator, you find yourself slipping into and out of competency. You can increase the consistency of your competency by taking formal training, practicing, participating with others who aspire to be better, and obtaining valuable feedback. Developing competence occurs much quicker than developing consciousness. Practice, training, and feedback help because they increase your consciousness. You “grow and know and it starts to show.”

Unconsciously Competent

With repetitive practice and experience, you reach a point where you no longer need to think about what you are doing. You become competent without the significant effort that characterizes the state of conscious competence. You will drift in and out of unconscious competence, based on the skills you master quickly. It takes little time to become unconsciously competent, only practice. Here your services are requested “because of what you know.” Eventually, you know that it feels right and you do it.

Howell (1982) originally describes the four stages:

“Unconscious incompetence – this is the stage where you are not even aware that you do not have a particular competence. Conscious incompetence – this is when you know that you want to learn how to do something but you are incompetent at doing it. Conscious competence – this is when you can achieve this particular task but you are very conscious about everything you do. Unconscious competence – this is when you finally master it and you do not even think about what you have such as when you have learned to ride a bike very successfully”
— (Howell, 1982, p.29-33)

See also: Howell, W.S. (1982). The Empathic Communicator University of Minnesota: Wadsworth Publishing Company

Remember, consciousness precedes competence, and superb competence does not take much time, but it does take practice. We hope you are getting your fair share of challenges and seize the opportunity for more practice and feedback.

For a six-minute video presentation on The Four Stages of Consciousness, turn here.

 

______

Don’t ruin your career by hosting bad meetings. Sign up for a workshop or send this to someone who should. MGRUSH workshops focus on meeting design and practice. Each person practices tools, methods, and activities daily during the week. Therefore, while some call this immersion, we call it the road to building high-value facilitation skills.

Our workshops also provide a superb way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 CDUs from IIBA, 40 Continuous Learning Points (CLPs) based on Federal Acquisition Certification Continuous Professional Learning Requirements using Training and Education activities, 40 Professional Development Units (PDUs) from SAVE International, as well as 4.0 CEUs for other professions. (See workshop and Reference Manual descriptions for details.)

Want a free 10-minute break timer? Sign up for our once-monthly newsletter HERE and receive a free timer along with four other of our favorite facilitation tools.

Meeting Documenter Accountability – If it isn’t documented, it didn’t happen.

Meeting Documenter Accountability – If it isn’t documented, it didn’t happen.

Don’t overlook the importance of your meeting documenter or documentation support. The document produced from an MGRUSH workshop provides the raw data for project deliverables. The meeting becomes a waste of time if meeting notes are not clear and accurate.

During lengthy, critical, and modeling workshops, you should solicit support to help with your documentation. It is important that your meeting documenter knows and agrees to their role, functions, and responsibilities.

Meeting Documenters, meeting documentation

Illustration by Julia Reich from Stone Soup Creative. A graphic recording approach by a meeting documenter.

Role of Neutrality for a Meeting Documenter

Emphasize to every meeting documenter that they are to remain absolutely neutral—they are part of the methodological team (i.e., context) and are never to interfere with the content during or after sessions.

Co-Facilitating Rotation

If or when co-facilitating, consider sharing roles. Pre-assign select steps to facilitate for each leader. When NOT facilitating, the other person serves as the meeting documenter.

Responsibilities of a Meeting Documenter

The meeting documenter is responsible for ensuring completeness and accuracy. The meeting documenter is also responsible for:

  • Ensuring the availability of proper tools and equipment.
  • Providing documentation that is properly named, archived, and available for the project team upon completion of the workshop.
  • Reading the documentation back to the group for clarification.
  • Rehearsing the documentation method before the session.
  • Transcribing the documentation with notes, decisions, charts, and matrices from the session.
  • The documenter assists the facilitator by capturing participant input that is written on flip charts or whiteboards. Capture photographs of the printed versions to double-check documenter accuracy.
  • Use the documenter to hang completed flip chart paper on the wall. This helps you to keep the session moving without distractions.  Arrange before the workshop where you expect to hang different sections or deliverables within the agenda.
  • When the group develops a definition or major decision during the session, ensure information is accurately and fully captured.
  • It is important to note that the documenter copies what the session leader writes onto flip charts, a front wall, or overheads. The documenter does not interpret the discussion, capture complete transcription, or capture random notes.
  • The documenter does not judge or evaluate what the group decides. If what they are hearing is unclear, the documenter must ask the session leader to ask the group for clarification and not intervene directly.

Who Makes the Best Meeting Documenter?

A meeting documenter should be easy to work with, willing to keep quiet (i.e., follow the role of content neutrality), have good handwriting, understand the situational terminology, be willing to work for you during the session, and understand the purpose and deliverable of the structured meeting notes. Good documenters can be found typically in three places:

Documentor

Meeting Documenter

  1. Trained session leaders frequently make strong documenters. Supporting one another and experience numerous benefits from cross-training, especially for newer facilitators.
  2. Project members from other, especially related projects. These people understand the terminology and how notes get used (e.g., input to requirements or design specs). They must be chosen carefully because they need to remain quiet and cannot become involved in the discussions.
  3. New hire trainees or interns provide a win-win opportunity. These people tend to work hard at being good documenters. They frequently have enough background in terminology that they do not get lost in the discussions.
  4. For purely narrative capture, administrative assistants will work wonders because you have removed them from more mundane activities.

Plan Your Work, Work Your Plan

The relationship between you and the documenter is important because the session leader and documenter comprise the methodological team responsible for generating the final deliverable. Optimally, constant communication between you is essential. Keep the following in mind when working with a documenter:

How to Train Documenters?

The following steps provide a method for training documenters:

  1. Provide them with a copy of your annotated agenda. Walk through each of the agenda steps, their role, the volume of documentation you expect, and what to do with it. Provide them with examples from prior workshops or deliverables to illustrate how their captured input will be used. Examples can be from previous sessions or created by the session leader, preferably relying upon a metaphor or analogy.
  2. Documenters often feel intimidated when they see a bunch of templates and do not understand their purpose. Explain the purpose of the deliverables from each question you intend to ask in the workshop. Your MGRUSH  Reference Manual includes descriptions of the deliverables from each step in the workshop of the Cookbook Agendas. Your note-taking tools should not get in the way of documentation. Let them modify the format of note-taking if it is appropriate.
  3. Develop a picture of the final deliverable of the workshop. You can use simple flow-chart or templates or arrows and icons to represent the final document structure. This helps the documenter to move the note-taking out of the abstract into something concrete.
  4. Walk through the technique and methods with the documenter prior to the session to ensure that that their role is clearly understood—address any questions they have.
  5. Training does not end with the start of the workshop. During the workshop, check with the documenter often to ensure that there are no problems and that the appropriate outputs are being properly documented.

Documenters

Checklist for Meeting Documenters

Use this checklist with your documenter to prepare and review.

  1. Sit where you can see and hear the session leader and what the session leader is writing on visual aids. Preferably, position yourself on the U-shaped table close to the facilitator.
  2. Have all materials ready before the workshop starts.
  3. Clear your work area from any distractions.
  4. Neat handwriting is necessary if you are handwriting.
  5. Listen to, understand, and be alert for key ideas.
  6. Give speakers and session leaders careful attention. Do not change meanings to your own. Document the main ideas; the essence of the discussion as taken from the flip charts or other visuals that the session leader is using. Capture the results from the visuals—not complete transcriptions or word by word minutes of the meeting.
  7. Capture information first—grammar and punctuation later.
  8. Avoid abbreviations, key, or cue words. Do not change words or meaning.
  9. Stick to verbatim comments whenever possible.
  10. Accurately and fully capture the ideas, workflows, outputs, and other components of any models or matrices that are built.
  11. Seek clarification and review as soon as possible if unsure. Remember—if not documented, it did not happen!
  12. Control your emotions. If you are reacting to your surroundings or a group member, you cannot listen effectively.
  13. Stay out of the discussion. Stick to your role. Stay neutral!

Meeting Documenters’ Guidelines

Once you have the right tool and the right documenter, use them properly.

  • Always take photographs of handwritten sheets as a back-up.
  • Do not attempt to capture documentation real time with the screen displayed to the participants (eg, using a large screen projector hooked up to the terminal). This distracts the participants from the purpose of the meeting (they become enamored with the tool), it forces a low-light condition (which may put some people to sleep), and any mistake, confusion, or slowness of capture is both visible and out of your control (the documenter is doing it).
  • Capture process flows or screen layouts and shows them to the participants. First, the session leader draws them on a whiteboard, flip chart, or another manual tool. The documenter captures the layout on a prototyping or mockup tool. When possible, project the finished illustration, diagram, or report on a large screen. If not, take a photograph of the original to re-create offline.
  • If you are using a modeling tool (eg, VISIO), have the documenter run the analysis routines during breaks, lunch, or in the evening. Use the results to develop questions for the workshop to ensure completeness before the end of the workshop. Take advantage of the analysis capabilities of the tool, but do not run the analysis with the participants waiting for you to finish.
  • Make certain that adequate backup is provided (both software copies and manual backup to cover the period of time since the last copy was made).  Automated tools sometimes crash, or electricity sometimes goes out. Do not be caught losing documentation.

______

Don’t ruin your career by hosting bad meetings. Sign up for a workshop or send this to someone who should. MGRUSH workshops focus on meeting design and practice. Each person practices tools, methods, and activities daily during the week. Therefore, while some call this immersion, we call it the road to building high-value facilitation skills.

Our workshops also provide a superb way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 CDUs from IIBA, 40 Continuous Learning Points (CLPs) based on Federal Acquisition Certification Continuous Professional Learning Requirements using Training and Education activities, 40 Professional Development Units (PDUs) from SAVE International, as well as 4.0 CEUs for other professions. (See workshop and Reference Manual descriptions for details.)

Want a free 10-minute break timer? Sign up for our once-monthly newsletter HERE and receive a free timer along with four other of our favorite facilitation tools.