Research by Ana Guinote and Mario Weick shows that people in positions of power are particularly ineffective planners.
People who feel powerful focus on getting what they want and ignore the potential obstacles that stand in the way. The planning fallacy: the planning efforts of powerful people rely frequently on “best case scenarios” and lead to far shorter time estimates than more practical plans that take into account what may go wrong.
Good time management starts with the deliverable and breaks it into manageable pieces, understanding the activities required to support each, and an estimate based on multiple factors such as group size, functionality, and experience. However, most leaders are relatively poor at estimating the time they will need to complete any task. Psychologists refer to this as both the planning fallacy and the bias of overconfidence. Fallacies and biases put us at increasing risk of reaching our objectives on time.
The Overconfidence Bias Damages
You can learn more accurately how to predict the length of an activity and become a better estimator and planner if you consider the potential obstacles and two other factors.
- Reflect on your past experiences and how long similar activities have taken in the past, and
- Break the activity into smaller pieces or tasks (e.g., questions or steps) and factor in the time for each task.
For example, Brainstorming as an activity should be broken into three tasks, namely:
- Diverge or List—estimate time based on whether or not you are using break-out teams, ELMO rule (Enough, Let’s Move On), etc.
- Analyze—estimate based on the tool to be used (e.g., PowerBalls or Decision Matrix) and allow time for scrubbing the list. Estimate separately for some time for thorough definitions, capturing omissions, and deleting sub-optimal input.
- Converge or Decide—estimate based on providing substantial reflection (i.e., active listening) around the rationale for decisions made and allow extra time for testing the decision against the initial purpose of the decision.
______
Don’t ruin your career by hosting bad meetings. Sign up for a workshop or send this to someone who should. MGRUSH workshops focus on meeting design and practice. Each person practices tools, methods, and activities every day during the week. Therefore, while some call this immersion, we call it the road to building high-value facilitation skills.
Our workshops also provide a superb way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 CDUs from IIBA, 40 Continuous Learning Points (CLPs) based on Federal Acquisition Certification Continuous Professional Learning Requirements using Training and Education activities, 40 Professional Development Units (PDUs) from SAVE International, as well as 4.0 CEUs for other professions. (See workshop and Reference Manual descriptions for details.)
Want a free 10-minute break timer? Sign up for our once-monthly newsletter HERE and receive a timer along with four other of our favorite facilitation tools, free.
Related articles
- Planning fallacy: why people suck at planning (sandglaz.com)
- Article: Estimating on agile projects: what’s the story, what’s the point? (infoq.com)
- IIBA Announces New Online Library for IIBA Members (projectmanagementforecm.wordpress.com)
Terrence Metz, MBA, CSM, CSPF, PSP01, HTTO1, is the Managing Director of MG RUSH Facilitation Leadership, Training, and Meeting Design, an acknowledged leader in structured facilitation training, and author of “Meetings That Get Results – A Facilitator’s Guide to Building Better Meetings.” His FAST Facilitation Best Practices blog features nearly 300 articles on facilitation skills and tools aimed at helping others lead meetings that produce clear and actionable results. His clients include Agilists, Scrum teams, program and project managers, senior officers, and the business analyst community among numerous private and public companies and global corporations. As an undergraduate of Northwestern University (Evanston, IL) and an MBA graduate from NWU’s Kellogg School of Management, his professional experience has focused on process improvement and product development. He continually aspires to make it easier for others to succeed.
Hello Terrence, Great advice. The underlying message is this: reliable estimating takes (at least) two people. Challenge is always beneficial. Have you thought about…? How did you arrive at…? As ever, Martin
As always Martin, You’ve augmented some good material with great questions and clear thinking. Facilitative leadership at its finest!
Thank you kindly.