{"id":6452,"date":"2017-09-29T15:31:03","date_gmt":"2017-09-29T19:31:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mgrush.com\/blog\/?p=6452"},"modified":"2026-04-21T13:19:31","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T17:19:31","slug":"action-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mgrush.com\/blog\/action-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Build Action Plans with Shared Ownership and Accountability"},"content":{"rendered":"

To build an action plan (or, a strategic plan) that transfers ownership and accountability to your meeting participants, begin with the right questions, in the right sequence.<\/h2>\n

Be one of the few facilitators who understand that ownership transfers instantly because participants offer their own\u00a0 “WHO does WHAT by WHEN,”\u00a0 the primary components of any action plan. Consequently, whether you’re planning includes strategies, initiatives, projects, activities, or tasks, when thoroughly completed, an action plan answers the following ten questions:<\/span><\/p>\n

(Please note in the sections that follow, the highlighted terms link to tools that facilitators may use to build the activities that comprise an action plan or a strategic plan).<\/em><\/span><\/h6>\n
\"Action

Action Plan (or, Strategic Plan) = Assignments<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

1. Why are we here?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

First of all, find the passion. While many MBA textbooks refer to this first step as a Mission<\/a>, much of the military-industrial complex refers to it as Vision<\/a>. Yet both answer the same question first, which is why we show up. Therefore, responses to this question fill in the blank landscape and provide a rationale for subsequent team actions. For example, why are Marriott employees in the hospitality industry? They could be in financial services, energy, etc. Capture the passion for showing up here and now.<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Who are we?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Frequently referred to as Values<\/a> or Guiding Principles, answers to this question describe the accouterments that describe or weigh down the participants. What do they carry with them? What do they wear? How will they treat each other? Different types of people<\/a> may share similar passions, such as mountain climbers, yet are very distinctive in their personalities (e.g., climbers using ropes versus trail walkers).<\/span><\/p>\n

3. Where are we going?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

People sticking together amplify their chances of success. Many teams prudently select a common view that guides their direction. While most MBA textbooks refer to this step as Vision<\/a>, some refer to this as Mission. And yet both approaches answer the same question of direction by agreeing on where the group will go.<\/span><\/p>\n

4. What will measure our progress?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

No proactive endeavor succeeds in a complex marketplace without measurements. While some consulting firms define Objectives as SMART<\/a> and Goals as fuzzy<\/a>, other firms use the exact opposite definitions. We are not biased<\/a> by the term used, but promote the concept that there are three different types of criteria: namely, SMART (i.e., specific\u2014frequently referred to as KPIs<\/a> or Key Performance Indicators), fuzzy (may be subjective, such as \u201ca great view at the top of the mountain\u201d), and binary (such as, \u201creach the summit”).<\/span><\/p>\n

5. What is our current situation?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Frequently viewed as four lists, robust TO-WS<\/a> actually contrasts two dimensions. The first dimension captures stuff within the group’s control, frequently referred to as strengths (plus) and weaknesses (minus). The second dimension captures stuff the group cannot control and is referred to as opportunities (plus) and threats (minus). A weakness that can be mitigated is NOT an opportunity because it is controllable. A group of mountain climbers might be agile (strength) and resource-thin (weakness). Additionally, they face a break in the weather (opportunity) or an avalanche (threat).<\/span><\/p>\n

6. To reach our goals and objectives, what must we do?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

To generate consensus<\/a> when prioritizing<\/a> hundreds of options, TO-WS\u00a0analysis begins to transfer ownership when participants own their analysis. While typically much can be done, groups and teams only have time and resources to manage the most important stuff. As a result, our quantitative approach to TO-WS\u00a0analysis simplifies complex<\/a> situations and ensures consensual understanding. (NOTE<\/span>: Many call this SWOT analysis but you should build the external Threats and Opportunities before tackling the internal Weaknesses and Strengths.)<\/span><\/p>\n

7. To what extent will these actions guarantee our success?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Alignment<\/a>\u00a0ensures the proper balance of WHAT is being done to reach the objectives (created to ensure reaching the vision). Use an open-ended approach, as in asking, \u201cTo what extent<\/a> does this WHAT support reaching this objective?\u201d and NOT the traditional, close-ended approach that suggests, \u201cDoes it?\u201d Consider using the Bookend<\/a> method to prioritize which actions have the greatest impact on reaching the objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

8. WHO does WHAT?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Frequently called Roles and Responsibilities, over twenty varieties of RACI<\/a> models, all promulgated by different consulting firms, answer the question WHO does WHAT. Our approach appends each assignment with WHEN it will be done, how much FTE (or, FTP)[1]<\/span> is required, and what type of resources will be requested\u2014resulting in a consensually owned GANTT<\/span> chart.<\/span><\/p>\n

9. What should we tell others about our progress?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Wouldn’t it be great if we sounded like we were all in the same meeting? Most call this step a\u00a0traditional communications plan. We call it Guardian of Change<\/a>\u00a0because of the bias found in some organizations where the best ideas are NOT approved; rather the most charismatic \u201cChampions\u201d obtain approvals (a scary thought if you are a stakeholder).<\/span><\/p>\n

10. Who will report back on open issues?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In your professional \u201cWrap\u201d review your work, manage the \u201cParking Lot\u201d or open issues, confirm a quick communications plan, and get feedback on how you did as the facilitator. Consequently, if you facilitate these ten questions, the group will understand, own, and live by WHAT it agrees to do.<\/span><\/p>\n

~~~~~~~<\/span><\/p>\n

[1] FTE equals Full-Time Employees roughly equivalent to 2,000 hours per year. FTP equals Full-Time Person (FTP) and also equates to roughly 2,000 hours per year.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

______<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Don\u2019t ruin your career by hosting bad meetings<\/a>. Sign up for a workshop<\/a> or send this to someone who should. MGRUSH<\/span><\/a><\/em> workshops focus on meeting design and practice. Each person practices tools, methods, and activities daily during the week. Therefore, while some call this immersion, we call it the road to building high-value facilitation skills.<\/span><\/p>\n

Go to the Facilitation Training Store\u00a0<\/a>to access proven, in-house resources, including fully annotated agendas, break timers, and templates. Finally, take a few seconds to buy us a cup of coffee<\/strong><\/a> and please SHARE with others.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In conclusion, we<\/em>\u00a0dare you to embrace the will, wisdom, and activities that amplify a facilitative leader. #facilitationtraining #MEETING DESIGN<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

______<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

With Bookmarks no longer a feature in WordPress, we need to append the following for your benefit and reference<\/span><\/p>\n