{"id":2462,"date":"2015-10-01T00:43:45","date_gmt":"2015-10-01T04:43:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/terrencemetz.com\/?p=2462"},"modified":"2026-04-21T13:41:45","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T17:41:45","slug":"olympic-scoring","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mgrush.com\/blog\/olympic-scoring\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Facilitate Olympic Scoring – Innovative Ideas & Concepts"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Purpose of Olympic Scoring is to <\/strong>extract some consensually validated new product, process, or other innovative<\/a> ideas or concepts while encouraging 100 percent participation. The following is particularly appropriate when facilitating Olympic scoring with larger groups of nine or more participants.<\/span><\/h2>\n

In advance, inform all of your participants to bring at least one idea or response to a prepared question. Immediately capture them during the meeting or workshop. While focused on a central theme (e.g., solution to a problem), break down your primary question into small, manageable pieces.<\/span><\/p>\n

For example, do NOT<\/span> ask what does the Marketing Plan look like. Understand that \u201cY\u201d is a function of numerous large \u201cX\u201d and small \u201cx\u201d so ask solid, detailed questions such as: Who should be our target audience for _________? \u00a0What should the message for target audience \u00a0_____________?<\/span><\/p>\n

Methodology\u00a0of Olympic Scoring<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Build three sets of flashcards with the numbers one through ten on each set. Consider using 4in * 6in index cards. In the meeting or workshop, consciously or randomly select three class members (\u201cexperts\u201d) who will serve as judges rather than content providers.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"How<\/a>

Olympic Scoring Method<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

After meeting participants present each idea or concept, the judges flash their scores, with more being better (i.e., ten is the best). The facilitator captures the three scores and tabulates them on a large Post-It<\/a>\u00ae. The highest score does not necessarily win, but the discussion will be minimized, if not eliminated, around the low-scoring options, thus encouraging the group to focus<\/a> its discussion on the best candidates.<\/span><\/p>\n

Deliverable from Olympic Scoring<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Subsequently or concurrently the facilitator leads discussions about the reason(s) to support the higher scores and captures the reasons and rationale for their decision on large Post-Its. The reasons provide the criteria that can now be used to re-evaluate all the ideas or to create new ideas, that optimally satisfy the appropriate criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

Considerations when Olympic Scoring<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Consider prioritizing or weighting the criteria since some will be more important than others. Traditionally the weighting system runs from one to five where more is better. You might use the Scorecard tool to calculate detailed scores or consider using the Perceptual Map<\/a> tool and arraying your options against the most important criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you have your participants prepare responses to more than one question, and have additional time, start over again. Consider appointing new judges so that all voices are viewed as equal contributors.<\/span><\/p>\n

______<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Lead the Change\u2014One Meeting at a Time<\/b><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n

Are you ready to transform how decisions are made, problems are solved, and alignment is built in your organization?<\/span><\/p>\n

True meeting leadership goes beyond setting an agenda.<\/b><\/span> It requires a facilitator who can navigate complexity, balance voices, and drive toward outcomes with clarity and consensus. Our Professional Meeting Leadership Workshop<\/b><\/span><\/a> equips you to do just that\u2014blending human-centric methods<\/b><\/span> with structured analytical tools<\/b><\/span> to foster rigor, inclusivity, and results that stick.<\/span><\/p>\n