{"id":13235,"date":"2021-12-02T07:00:25","date_gmt":"2021-12-02T12:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mgrush.com\/blog\/?p=13235"},"modified":"2026-04-21T12:57:26","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T16:57:26","slug":"product-concept-management","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mgrush.com\/blog\/product-concept-management\/","title":{"rendered":"Myths and Gremlins of New Product Concept Management (PCM)"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>Our last article<\/a> launched a method for managing new product ideas called Catalyst or PCM<\/h2>\n

Now we take a step back before explaining the activities (next article) to tackle some of the myths and gremlins associated with new product concept management and development.<\/span><\/p>\n

New Product Concept Development Disciplines<\/span><\/h5>\n

Product Concept Management requires numerous disciplines, including technical, information systems, creative, marketing, and financial management. Cross-functional demand frequently becomes a point of failure for many organizations in their attempts to maintain a fertile pool of new product ideas.\u00a0The PCM process comprises three major steps: \u201cSOURCING\u201d ideas, \u201cMANAGING\u201d ideas (into concepts), and \u201cUSING\u201d concepts for further evaluation and possible development.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>

Three major steps of the PCM process: \u201cSOURCING\u201d ideas, \u201cMANAGING\u201d ideas (into concepts), and \u201cUSING\u201d concepts for further evaluation and possible development.<\/span><\/center><\/p><\/div>\n

The act of \u2018deciding\u2019 represents the most important activity of PCM; deciding whether to USE or publish a concept for further development. Without the movement of a concept onto final development, no useful work gets accomplished. At the same time, most investment today focuses on the SOURCING or authoring activity. Namely, the source volume and \u201ccreativity\u201d of the ideas placed for consideration.<\/span><\/p>\n

With Catalyst, the bulk of the work occurs during QUALIFYING. PCM holds that raw ideas represent slight notions of a product or business need. Most new product people have enough \u201cgood\u201d ideas. In truth, most ideas are \u201cgood,\u201d but suffer from a lack of certainty about their future viability.<\/span><\/p>\n

In our view, their degree of certainty distinguishes good ideas. The QUALIFYING step in PCM requires activities that convert raw ideas into polished concepts. Then polished concepts become available for consideration and additional investment.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Product Concept Management (PCM or Catalyst) and Development Overview<\/em><\/span><\/h5>\n

PCM specifies each step as multiple, discrete activities. In practice, often compressed in time, they look like a single step. For example, when a salesperson suggests an idea to a product manager. In that discussion, the product idea takes partial form in terms of its function, customer benefits, competitive situation, and future sales opportunities. The product manager evaluates the idea for fit into the product line, corporate marketing strategy, and the organization\u2019s appetite for funding new products. In this example, the bulk of the PCM technique occurs in a matter of minutes.<\/span><\/p>\n

Typical Idea (Instant) Evaluation Process<\/em><\/span><\/h5>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The Many\u00a0Product Concept Management\u00a0Myths<\/h3>\n

Many myths perpetuate the practical and academic field of New Product Development and Ideation. We don\u2019t purport to disrupt the belief system of these fields but do wish to add to the excellent progress made in recent years in improving the management of Ideation and New Product Management.<\/span><\/p>\n

MYTH: There are good ideas and bad ideas, but only a few really great ideas.<\/span><\/h4>\n

FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 All ideas are good as long as they are sound in their construction. An idea seen by a business manager (or \u201creviewer\u201d in our parlance) may be a poor fit for the business conditions of that day and for his\/her specific purposes. But fit does not equivocate to the quality of an idea. PCM frees ideas from judgments of \u201cgood\u201d or \u201cbad.\u201d The \u201cgoodness\u201d of an idea depends on two characteristics of the reviewer: (1) the fit of the idea with the needs of the company, and (2) certainty about the future performance of the product in the market, in the hands of a specific company, through specific channels, to specific customers, at a specific time. These two characteristics do not depend on the idea but on the owner of the idea. The burden of finding \u201cgreat\u201d ideas, therefore, falls into the hands of the organization.<\/span><\/p>\n

MYTH: We don\u2019t need more ideas, we need \u201chome runs.\u201d<\/span><\/h4>\n

FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 An organization and its management may want \u201chome runs.\u201d They seek the eventual impact of new product ideas, not whether the idea becomes a \u201chome run\u201d or not. A home run for one company could be a dud for another. A home run this year could be a dud next year. With slight changes in material specifications, the dud could become a cash cow in a different division. The burden is not on the idea of being great. The challenge of greatness belongs to those who handle the idea.<\/span><\/p>\n

MYTH: We don\u2019t have enough ideas. We\u2019ve run out.<\/span><\/h4>\n

FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 Zillions of new ideas develop every day. Each of us probably develops a handful of new ideas for products, product attributes, packaging, and so on. Many take shape before we arrive at our offices, based on our morning routines. Frequently we envision ideas, but perhaps not for our own business. Those ideas might be availed to whomever is willing to invest to gather them. Ideas arise in our heads continuously, for untold numbers of products and applications. Most of these ideas evaporate soon after they form.<\/span><\/p>\n

MYTH: Our new product development process is terrific. We need better filters at the ideation stage to keep the bad ideas out. (Or, more filters are better.)<\/span><\/h4>\n

FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 We don\u2019t argue that your\u00a0NPD process may be functioning well, or that ideas pass through development and flop in the market. However,\u00a0more<\/u> and better filters do not assure better product market performance. The perfect filter would be needed only once. Therefore, \u201cmore filters\u201d implies low-quality filters at each stage of their application. More<\/u> ideas indicate more success, with better information about their prospects, rather than fewer with tighter filters. If the profitability of an idea exceeds thresholds with 100% certainty when conceived, it would be pushed through development and launch with no filters. The defect in NPD and launch is not \u201cbad\u201d ideas or necessarily poor filters. The quality of information about the prospects for a new idea or the \u201ccertainty\u201d of an idea\u2019s prospects drives improved decision-making.<\/span><\/p>\n

MYTH: We can\u2019t afford to invest in many new product ideas.<\/h4>\n

FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 Again, we don\u2019t take issue with the notion of allocating scarce investment resources. However, we believe that if proper investment is not<\/u> made at the earliest stages of idea management, poor-performing concepts will make it through NPD and into launch (for eventual failure) without sufficient success to pay for the failures.<\/span><\/p>\n

MYTH: We can\u2019t afford a product failure.<\/span><\/h4>\n

FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 No one wants product failure, but some failures cannot be avoided. To eliminate new product failures, the only complete solution prohibits new product development. To accept a reasonable degree of risk, investment is required to reduce the uncertainty around a new idea.<\/span><\/p>\n

MYTH: We don\u2019t need a process of new product ideas, we need a champion.\u201d<\/span><\/h4>\n

FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 A “champion” provides\u00a0prima facie\u00a0<\/em>evidence that your approach remains hostile to new product ideas and new product success. Perhaps not by intent, but by behavior. A champion is only needed when one or more of these conditions exist:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The existing new product idea and development process has low\/no credibility within the organization (or doesn\u2019t exist) and the \u201cchampion\u201d acts in a vacuum;<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. \u201cCertainty\u201d appears only to the champion and not to the people involved, and the champion provides the lone supporting voice.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Popular business management lore converts folk heroes into \u201cchampions.\u201d Champions reflect a failure to create a viable system that transcends individual fortitude and charisma. When you find an aggressive \u201cowner\u201d of a neutral method, then you\u2019ve found your true \u201cchampion.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

    MYTH: There isn\u2019t enough money to support more new product ideas.<\/span><\/h4>\n

    FACT<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0 Money abounds. With a decent idea and reasonable certainty. you can attract a virtually endless supply of money. An idea with a certain payoff will attract investment with ease. Certainty provides the key. Money stays away from ideas it doubts. Venture capitalists knowingly invest in incredibly risky ideas: they invest in ideas they feel have a reasonably good chance of success after researching the opportunity. Venture capitalists accept different<\/em> risks than the average corporation, but not necessarily more<\/em> risk, and certainly not<\/em> less well-researched ideas. The more certainty in the performance of your idea, the easier the money will be found.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Product Concept Management Gremlins<\/h3>\n

    Many \u201cgremlins\u201d also arise in Product Concept Management. By gremlins, we mean the attitudes, behavior, policies, and cultural norms that tear at the fabric of successful new product ideation and development. Gremlins operate to hinder PCM at any time, in many ways, and with frightening effectiveness.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Gremlins range from apathy to \u201cchampioning\u201d a product through to launch. Our observation of the greatest gremlins suggests:<\/span><\/p>\n