<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for MG RUSH Facilitation Best Practices Blog	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mgrush.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/</link>
	<description>Compelling observations about structured, facilitative leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:54:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on A Few Dozen Highly Effective Icebreakers (aka, Meeting Sparks) by Facilitation Expert		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/icebreakers-meeting-sparks/#comment-135459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facilitation Expert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrencemetz.com/?p=1728#comment-135459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mgrush.com/blog/icebreakers-meeting-sparks/#comment-76847&quot;&gt;Terrence Metz&lt;/a&gt;.

Much appreciated Alex.  Good prompts.  I look forward to using them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mgrush.com/blog/icebreakers-meeting-sparks/#comment-76847">Terrence Metz</a>.</p>
<p>Much appreciated Alex.  Good prompts.  I look forward to using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on A Few Dozen Highly Effective Icebreakers (aka, Meeting Sparks) by Alex Rivera		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/icebreakers-meeting-sparks/#comment-135458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Rivera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 10:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrencemetz.com/?p=1728#comment-135458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great list of meeting sparks! To add a few more variations:

- Personal Trivia: Each person shares a unique fact that isn&#039;t on their resume.
- Virtual Scavenger Hunt: Ask participants to find something within arm&#039;s reach that tells a story.
- Human Bingo: A classic interactive way to find common ground.

For anyone looking for a structured way to run that last one, this [Human bingo icebreaker](https://icebreaker-games.org/human-bingo) resource is very helpful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list of meeting sparks! To add a few more variations:</p>
<p>&#8211; Personal Trivia: Each person shares a unique fact that isn&#8217;t on their resume.<br />
&#8211; Virtual Scavenger Hunt: Ask participants to find something within arm&#8217;s reach that tells a story.<br />
&#8211; Human Bingo: A classic interactive way to find common ground.</p>
<p>For anyone looking for a structured way to run that last one, this [Human bingo icebreaker](<a href="https://icebreaker-games.org/human-bingo" rel="nofollow ugc">https://icebreaker-games.org/human-bingo</a>) resource is very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Quantitative SWOT Analysis (TO-WS) Makes it Easier &#038; Faster to Build Consensus by Facilitation Expert		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/quantitative-swot/#comment-135444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facilitation Expert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mgrush.com/blog/?p=4758#comment-135444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic variant. Let us know how well it models for you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic variant. Let us know how well it models for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Quantitative SWOT Analysis (TO-WS) Makes it Easier &#038; Faster to Build Consensus by J.G.M. van der Zanden		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/quantitative-swot/#comment-135422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.G.M. van der Zanden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mgrush.com/blog/?p=4758#comment-135422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would prefer to fill the crossingpoints with amounts of money (added margin). 
That&#039;s a much better and far more objective way of prioritizing the stratgic ssues.....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer to fill the crossingpoints with amounts of money (added margin).<br />
That&#8217;s a much better and far more objective way of prioritizing the stratgic ssues&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Twenty Popular Brain Teasers to Stimulate Meeting Participants by Laura		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/brain-teasers/#comment-135316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrencemetz.com/?p=2458#comment-135316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some of these really had me stumped! I only had about half of them on my first try.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of these really had me stumped! I only had about half of them on my first try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Methodological Awareness About Deming’s 14 Points of Continuous Improvement by Facilitation Expert		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/continuous-improvement/#comment-135257</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facilitation Expert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrencemetz.com/?p=2427#comment-135257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mgrush.com/blog/continuous-improvement/#comment-135253&quot;&gt;penetration testing&lt;/a&gt;.

Agreed. You might want to look at &lt;a href=&quot;https://chozan.co/blog/digital-transformation-lessons-haiers-rendanheyi/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;RenDanHeYi&lt;/a&gt;, a term popularized by Haier, a leading Chinese multinational consumer electronics and home appliances company, translates roughly to &quot;people, short link, value.&quot; It emphasizes direct interactions between employees and users (customers), aiming to dissolve traditional hierarchical structures and promote an entrepreneurial culture within the organization. The model focuses on creating micro-enterprises within the larger corporate structure, each operating independently and responsively to market demands.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mgrush.com/blog/continuous-improvement/#comment-135253">penetration testing</a>.</p>
<p>Agreed. You might want to look at <a href="https://chozan.co/blog/digital-transformation-lessons-haiers-rendanheyi/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">RenDanHeYi</a>, a term popularized by Haier, a leading Chinese multinational consumer electronics and home appliances company, translates roughly to &#8220;people, short link, value.&#8221; It emphasizes direct interactions between employees and users (customers), aiming to dissolve traditional hierarchical structures and promote an entrepreneurial culture within the organization. The model focuses on creating micro-enterprises within the larger corporate structure, each operating independently and responsively to market demands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Methodological Awareness About Deming’s 14 Points of Continuous Improvement by penetration testing		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/continuous-improvement/#comment-135253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[penetration testing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrencemetz.com/?p=2427#comment-135253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Organizations that excel at managing change gain a competitive advantage by being more responsive to market demands, innovating faster, and maintaining high levels of employee satisfaction and engagement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organizations that excel at managing change gain a competitive advantage by being more responsive to market demands, innovating faster, and maintaining high levels of employee satisfaction and engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Voting Sucks Because it Leads to Bigger Numbers but Lower Quality Decisions by clay shentrup		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/voting-sucks/#comment-135161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clay shentrup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 21:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrencemetz.com/?p=2812#comment-135161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#062; Results:  The approach does little to distinguish between acceptable options and outstanding options. Results have been known to be highly erratic.

i would strongly disagree with this assessment. i&#039;ve studied voting theory for almost 20 years, was mentioned in the 2008 book &quot;gaming the vote&quot; by william poundstone, and co-founded the center for election science. full disclosure: ces promotes approval voting.

the intensity of support between different options actually impacts the strategic &quot;approval threshold&quot;, as explained here by by me, but citing the research of a princeton math phd named warren smith, who is arguably history&#039;s greatest expert on voting methods. (smith owns the site and served as an editor on this.)

https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6

few voters are this mathematically precise, but this is indeed the strategy the intuitively use to a close approximation. e.gh. i really prefer elizabeth warren, but biden&#039;s not too bad and i&#039;m really worried about trump winning, so i&#039;m going to lower my threshold and approve them both.&quot;


the aggregate result of these kinds of strategies over a variety of voting methods has been studied via computer simulation by both warren smith and contemporaries like jameson quinn, a harvard stats phd who also served with myself and smith on the board of ces. some results summarized here:

https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6
https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/

suffice to say, that approval voting performs extremely well, and tends to elect the condorcet winner whenever one exists.

clay shentrup
portland, or]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Results:  The approach does little to distinguish between acceptable options and outstanding options. Results have been known to be highly erratic.</p>
<p>i would strongly disagree with this assessment. i&#8217;ve studied voting theory for almost 20 years, was mentioned in the 2008 book &#8220;gaming the vote&#8221; by william poundstone, and co-founded the center for election science. full disclosure: ces promotes approval voting.</p>
<p>the intensity of support between different options actually impacts the strategic &#8220;approval threshold&#8221;, as explained here by by me, but citing the research of a princeton math phd named warren smith, who is arguably history&#8217;s greatest expert on voting methods. (smith owns the site and served as an editor on this.)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6</a></p>
<p>few voters are this mathematically precise, but this is indeed the strategy the intuitively use to a close approximation. e.gh. i really prefer elizabeth warren, but biden&#8217;s not too bad and i&#8217;m really worried about trump winning, so i&#8217;m going to lower my threshold and approve them both.&#8221;</p>
<p>the aggregate result of these kinds of strategies over a variety of voting methods has been studied via computer simulation by both warren smith and contemporaries like jameson quinn, a harvard stats phd who also served with myself and smith on the board of ces. some results summarized here:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6</a><br />
<a href="https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/</a></p>
<p>suffice to say, that approval voting performs extremely well, and tends to elect the condorcet winner whenever one exists.</p>
<p>clay shentrup<br />
portland, or</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Executive Presence Strengthens Your Meeting Facilitation Skills by Facilitation Expert		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/executive-presence/#comment-134213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facilitation Expert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 02:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mgrush.com/blog/?p=13351#comment-134213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mgrush.com/blog/executive-presence/#comment-134211&quot;&gt;Natea Dawn Williams&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Natea, Unfortunately, we are booked the entire week of March 27. Our first opening does not arrive until May. Thanks however, for the opportunity to be of service.  -- Terrence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mgrush.com/blog/executive-presence/#comment-134211">Natea Dawn Williams</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Natea, Unfortunately, we are booked the entire week of March 27. Our first opening does not arrive until May. Thanks however, for the opportunity to be of service.  &#8212; Terrence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Executive Presence Strengthens Your Meeting Facilitation Skills by Natea Dawn Williams		</title>
		<link>https://mgrush.com/blog/executive-presence/#comment-134211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natea Dawn Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 02:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mgrush.com/blog/?p=13351#comment-134211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello, I&#039;m looking for Facilitator for my company Priment in Chicago to train on How to Become a Successful Senior leader. The dates are between March 28-29. To put together a session for 4 to 8 hours with topics that will best fit in that time frame and topic. We have 9 Senior leaders that would be in attendance. I wanted to see what the cost would be, for a program like this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I&#8217;m looking for Facilitator for my company Priment in Chicago to train on How to Become a Successful Senior leader. The dates are between March 28-29. To put together a session for 4 to 8 hours with topics that will best fit in that time frame and topic. We have 9 Senior leaders that would be in attendance. I wanted to see what the cost would be, for a program like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
