Use an After Action Review for debriefing a project, program, or other initiatives. An After Action Review may also be called an After-Action Debriefing, a Look Back, a Post Mortem, or a Hot Wash, among others. In the Agile community, some call it a Retrospective. The concept provides a reflection by those involved to learn what happened so that we can improve future performance.
Purpose of an After Action Review Meeting
An After Action Review is NOT intended to critique, grade success, or failure. Rather, it identifies weaknesses that need improvement and strengths that might be sustained.
Therefore, an After Action Review answers four “learning culture” questions:
- (Purpose) What was supposed to happen?
- (Results) What did happen?
- (Causes) What caused the difference?
- (Implications) What can we learn from this?
The After Action Review provides a candid discussion of actual performance results compared to objectives. Hence, the engagement participants contribute their input and perspective. They provide their insight, observation, and questions that help reinforce strengths and identify and correct the deficiencies of the completed project or action.
Learning cultures highly value collaborative inquiry and reflection. The U.S. Army uses After Action Reviews extensively. Using a variety of means to collect hard, verifiable data to assess performance. The Army refers to these as “ground truths.”
Participants identify mistakes they made as well as mistakes made by others. They prohibit any other use of the candid discussions, including performance reviews.
Focus on what can be learned, not who can be blamed.
Therefore, the U.S. Army’s approach has five basic guidelines that govern its After Action Reviews, namely:
Tips for an After Action Review Meeting
- Call it like you see it
- Discover the “ground truth”
- No sugar coating
- No thin or thick skins
- Take thorough notes
After Action Reviews value open, candor, and frankness. Not many groups open up and provide complete candor, but you should encourage full disclosure. Participants identify mistakes they made as well as observations about others. Discourage or prohibit any other use of the confidential discussions, such as supporting performance evaluations.
This workshop typical takes from a partial day to an entire week. It may include twenty to thirty people or more, but not necessarily everyone at once, as participation may be spread out over the course of the workshop.
Agenda for an After Action Review Meeting
Begin with a standard introduction and emphasize the project objectives and expected impact of the project on the organizational holarchy. Carefully articulate and codify key assumptions or constraints.
Results are compared to the SMART objectives. Items that worked or hampered provide input for later discussion. Be careful with scope creep immediately. Questions that may be out-of-bounds at this time include why certain actions were taken, how stakeholders reacted, why adjustments were made (or not), what assumptions developed, and other questions that need to be managed later.
Goals and Considerations
Compare the project results to the fuzzy goals and other considerations. Again, be careful with scope creep. Manage other questions later such as why certain actions were taken, how stakeholders reacted, why adjustments occurred (or not), and what assumptions developed.
What Worked & Hampered
Results-focused discussion focused (or lack thereof) stimulates talk about options and conditions to leverage in future projects.
- How stakeholders reacted
- What assumptions developed
- What worked and hampered
- Why certain actions took priority
- What adjustments worked (or not)
- Other questions as appropriate.
Issues and Risks
Use the standard MG RUSH review and wrap-up
Special Ground Rules for an After Action Review Meeting
This workshop can handle more than twenty people, with frequent use of break out groups. Do not hesitate to partition the workshop so that participants may come and go as required. You may need to loop back, cover material built earlier, and clarify or add to it. The approach shifts the culture from one where blame is ascribed to one where learning is prized, yet team members willingly remain accountable.
ConductAfter Action Reviews consistently after all significant projects, programs, and initiatives. Do NOT isolate “failed” or “stressed” projects only. Some ground rules and guidelines that have proven successful in past include:
- Do NOT judge success or failure of individuals (ie; judge performance, not the person)
- Focus on the objectives first
- Encourage participants to raise any and all potentially important issues and lessons
For learning organizations, the following also support cultural growth, post After Action Reviews, namely:
- Some of the most valuable learning derives from the most stressful situations
- Transform subjective comments and observations into objective learning by converting adjectives such as “quick” into SMART criteria (ie, Specific, Measurable, Adjustable, Relevant, and Time-Based) such as “less than 30 seconds.”
- Use facilitators who understand the importance of neutrality and do not lecture or preach
- Teach the team to teach itself
Therefore, effective use of After Action Reviews support a mindset in organizations that are never satisfied with the status quo—where candid, honest, and open discussion evidences learning as part of the organizational culture. In conclusion, learning is everyone’s responsibility and it begins with hard data used to analyze results.
Finally, MG RUSH professional facilitation curriculum focuses on providing methodology. Each student thoroughly practices methodology and tools before class concludes. Some call this immersion. We call it the road to building impactful facilitation skills.
Become Part of the Solution While You Improve Your Facilitation, Leadership, and Methodology Skills
Take a class or forward this to someone who should. MG RUSH Professional Facilitation Training provides an excellent way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 PDUs from PMI, 40 CDUs from IIBA, and 3.2 CEUs. As a member of the International Association of Facilitators (IAF), our Professional Facilitation. Therefore, our training aligns with IAF Certification Principles and fully prepares alumni for their Certified Professional Facilitator designation.
Furthermore, our Professional Facilitation curriculum immerses students in the responsibilities and dynamics of an effective facilitator and methodologist. Because nobody is smarter than everybody, attend an MG RUSH Professional Facilitation, Leadership, and Methodology workshop offered around the world, see MG RUSH for a current schedule.
Go to the Facilitation Training Store to access our in-house resources. You will discover numerous annotated agendas, break timers, and templates. Finally, take a few seconds to buy us a cup of coffee and please SHARE.
In conclusion, we dare you to embrace the will, wisdom, and activities that amplify a facilitative leader.
- How To Manage Group Conflict (mgrush.com/blog)
- How to Help Resolve Business Arguments (mgrush.com/blog)
- Responsibility Matrix, Agenda Design, and Parking Lot Management (mgrush.com/blog)