With structured analysis, each piece of data or single cell might be decomposed another layer. Amplify this approach even further by splitting your four cells into sixteen.
Therefore, see the chart below. We can now ask, generate, and record sixteen pieces of information on a large Post-It® for each assignment. Note how we take the four basic criteria below and expand them into four additional details (for illustrative purposes only):
Other Best Practices articles instructed that one key to facilitating effective analysis mandates the facilitator to ask open-ended questions, not simple, close-ended (ie, yes or no) confirmations. For example, and pardon the simplicity, do not ask “Does the sport of curling involve any sweat?” Someone will make a compelling argument that it does, albeit minimal perhaps. The superior question, simply re-phrased: “To what extent does the sport of curling involve sweat? (a lot, little, or somewhere in between)”.
When building a roles and responsibilities matrix for example, the classic approach identifies who is going to be ‘Responsible’ for some apportioned activity or assignment and the appropriate single cell is given a large, red “R”. At minimum you might ask four questions, such as:
- What role will be responsible for this assignment? (eg, Business Analyst)
- When will we reach completion? (eg, date specific)
- How much financial resource will be required to complete it? (eg, $,$$$)
- What is the estimated FTE required to bring it to completion? (FTE = full time equivalent, such as 0.25 which is one person, full-time, for three months)
What role will be responsible for this assignment? (eg, RASI Chart)
- What role is ultimately being held Accountable and paying for this initiative? (eg, EVP)
- What role will be Responsible for this assignment? (eg, Business Analyst)
- What roles will be Supporting this assignment? (eg, Project Manager)
- What roles need to be Informed about this assignment? (eg, Customer)
At what estimated point in time will we reach completion? (eg, date specific)
- When does concerted effort begin? (eg, date specific)
- What is the projected half-way point? (eg, date specific)
- At what estimated point in time will completion be final? (eg, date specific)
- When will the effort be reviewed such as Retrospective or Look Back? (eg, date specific)
How much financial resource will be required to complete it? (eg, $,$$$)
- What are the estimated research costs? (eg, $,$$$)
- What are the estimated acquisition costs? (eg, $,$$$)
- What are the estimated operational costs? (eg, $,$$$)
- What are the estimated termination costs? (eg, $,$$$)
What is the estimated FTP required to bring it to completion? (FTP = full time person, such as 0.25 which is one person, full-time, for three months)
- What maximum number of people work at the same time? (eg, Quantity)
- Call on which special subject matter experts? (eg, Title[s])
- How much FTP will bring it to completion? (eg, FTP)
- Codify any special issues not described above. (narrative, perhaps coded)
Having left a meeting can be comforting because the amount of detail described above is substantial, but knowing that it was consensually built and is now owned by the meeting participants is reassuring. When applied to a project plan, using questions similar to the ones shown above, you will deliver up a more detailed GANTT chart than most people build in their cubicles alone. Hand this off to an intern who claims to be “expert” with Microsoft Project Manager® and tell them to bring you back a fully resource allocated project plan so that you can go on to your next meeting.
Finally, MG RUSH professional facilitation curriculum focuses on providing methodology. Each student thoroughly practices methodology and tools before class concludes. Additionally, some call this immersion. However, we call it the road to building impactful facilitation skills.
Become Part of the Solution While You Improve Your Facilitation, Leadership, and Methodology Skills
Take a class or forward this to someone who should. MG RUSH Professional Facilitation Training provides an excellent way to earn up to 40 SEUs from the Scrum Alliance, 40 PDUs from PMI, 40 CDUs from IIBA, and 3.2 CEUs. As a member of the International Association of Facilitators (IAF), our Professional Facilitation. Therefore, our training aligns with IAF Certification Principles and fully prepares alumni for their Certified Professional Facilitator designation.
Furthermore, our Professional Facilitation curriculum immerses students in the responsibilities and dynamics of an effective facilitator and methodologist. Because nobody is smarter than everybody, attend an MG RUSH Professional Facilitation, Leadership, and Methodology workshop offered around the world, see MG RUSH for a current schedule.
Go to the Facilitation Training Store to access our in-house resources. You will discover numerous annotated agendas, break timers, and templates. Finally, take a few seconds to buy us a cup of coffee and please SHARE.
In conclusion, we dare you to embrace the will, wisdom, and activities that amplify a facilitative leader.